社交媒體、短信、電郵……給我們帶來了什么?提筆忘字?不規(guī)范的語法與表達(dá)?無法表達(dá)連貫的思想?Simon Kuper對(duì)這種觀點(diǎn)不以為然。他說,2000年前就有老學(xué)究們惋惜語言的衰敗了,信息時(shí)代和社交媒體實(shí)際上大大幫助人們提高了寫作和閱讀能力。
測(cè)試中可能遇到的詞匯和知識(shí):
CC Carbon Copy,抄送
mute [mju?t] n.啞巴
vandal ['vænd?l] n.汪達(dá)爾人(曾經(jīng)洗劫羅馬),破壞文化的人
Genghis Khan 成吉思汗
pedant ['ped(?)nt] n.學(xué)究,書呆子
omniscience [?m'n?s??ns] n.全知;上帝
astrophysicist [,æstr??'fi?z?s?st] n.天體物理學(xué)家
abound [?'ba?nd] adj.富余,充滿
The Onion magazine 一家專職諷刺和搞笑的媒體,發(fā)表過“金正恩獲評(píng)世上最性感男子”等著名“新聞”。
heartthrob ['hɑ?tθr?b] n.柔情,心跳對(duì)象
insomnia [?n's?mn??] n.失眠
syntax ['s?ntæks] n.句法
How social media improved writing (866 words)
By Simon Kuper
Here’s an email exchange I had with a colleague the other day:
Colleague: Thought it was a bit too easy! I’ll go back to them and see when the next times are. Thanks Simon
Me: Sorry about this. If you cc me, then I can take over planning and make your life easier
Colleague: i don’t mind – lets see what she says next but if it gets silly i’ll step aside.
This is a very modern phenomenon: writing that reads like conversation. Day by day, prose is becoming blessedly more like speech. Social media, blogs and emails have hugely improved the way we write.
Before the internet, only professional writers wrote. I remember the term at school when we were taught to write essays. Most of my classmates just endured it. They’d never written down their extended thoughts before, and were confident they’d never need do it again.
A woman I know says only after the internet arrived did she realise her mother was semi-literate. Previously they’d always communicated by phone, but now Mom was suddenly sending her emails full of “!!!!”s and “……”s.
Email kicked off an unprecedented expansion in writing. We’re now in the most literate age in history. I remember in 2003 asking someone, “What’s a blog?” By 2006, the analysis firm NM Incite had identified 36 million blogs worldwide; five years later, there were 173 million. Use of online social media rises every month. In fact, writing is overtaking speech as the most common form of interaction. Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, says Britons now text absent friends and family more often than they speak to them on the phone or in person.
Pessimists like to call this the death of civilisation: a vision of mute youths exchanging semi-literate solipsistic messages. John Humphrys, the BBC broadcaster, once dismissed “texters” as “vandals who are trying to do to the language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbours”.
He’s wrong. As the Columbia linguist John McWhorter points out, pedants have been lamenting the decline of language since at least AD63. Clare Wood, development psychologist at Coventry University, says very little research exists to back up claims such as Humphrys’. Her own study of primary schoolchildren suggested that texting improved their reading ability. Texters, after all, are constantly practising reading and spelling. Sure, children tend not to punctuate text messages. But most of them grasp that this genre has different rules from, say, school exams. That’s a distinction we adults are slowly learning: I’ve only just begun dropping commas from texts.
But texts, blogs, emails and Facebook posts are infecting other kinds of writing, and mostly for the good. They are making journalism, books and business communications more conversational.
Social media offer a pretty good model for how to write. First, the writers mostly keep it short. People on Twitter often omit “I”, “the” and “a”, which are usually wastes of space anyway. Vocabulary tends to be casual: bloggers say “but” instead of “however”. They don’t claim a false omniscience, but proclaim their subjectivity. And the writing is usually unpolished, barely edited. That’s a great strength. “Major Memory for Microblogs”*, a recent article in the academic journal Memory & Cognition, found that people were much better at remembering casual writing like Facebook posts or forum comments than lines from books or journalism. One possible reason: “The relatively unfiltered and spontaneous production of one person’s mind is just the sort of thing that is readily stored in another’s mind.” That’s probably why Twitter, Facebook and reality TV are successful.
The unfiltered productions of people’s minds are often stupid. However, they don’t have to be. Nobel Prize-winning academics tweet too. You can say brilliant things even in casual conversational prose (except perhaps if you’re an astrophysicist). It’s just that conversational prose improves your chances of being heard and understood. True, other styles are valid too. Jane Austen wrote formally. But for an average writer with no particular gift, the conversational mode works best. (The other tip for getting a point across is to tell a human story, as I always want to shout at conference speakers who talk in diagrams.)
Of course, bad writing still abounds. The Onion magazine loves parodying newspaper prose, as in this fake news story naming North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-eun as the sexiest man alive: “With his devastatingly handsome, round face, his boyish charm, and his strong, sturdy frame, this Pyongyang-bred heartthrob is every woman’s dream come true.” And old-fashioned overwriting survives too, as in this recent newspaper column about insomnia: “Those liminal hours between dark and dawn continue to haunt my praxis even now that my nest is empty.”
But mostly, social media have done wonders for writing. George Orwell in 1944 lamented the divide between wordy, stilted written English, and much livelier speech. “Spoken English is full of slang,” he wrote, “it is abbreviated wherever possible, and people of all social classes treat its grammar and syntax in a slovenly way.” His ideal was writing that sounded like speech. We’re getting there at last.
請(qǐng)根據(jù)你所讀到的文章內(nèi)容,完成以下自測(cè)題目:
1.What is a merit brought by the social media on the way we write?
A. School children rarely write down entended thoughts.
B. Emails are often full of “!!!!”s and “……”s.
C. People can constantly practise reading and spelling.
D. Britons now text friends and family more often than they speak to them.
答案(1)
2.Who would be happy about the impact of social media on the way we write?
A. Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator.
B. John Humphrys, the BBC broadcaster.
C. Pedants in the Roman era
D. George Orwell, the writer.
答案(2)
3.According to the writer, why Twitter, Facebook and reality TV are successful?
A. The informations are usually short.
B. The vocabulary tends to be simple.
C. The are cool and fashionable.
D. They are appealing to human instincts.
答案(3)
4.Why quoting the Onion magazine and its report on Kim Jong-eun?
A. To provide a bad exemple of writing.
B. To mock a bad kind of newspaper prose.
C. To introduce us an interesting website.
D. To tell that old-fashioned overwriting is disappearing.
答案(4)
* * *
(1) 答案:C.People can constantly practise reading and spelling.
解釋:很顯然ABD是經(jīng)常招致批評(píng)和吐槽的現(xiàn)象,而作者“旗幟鮮明”地表示社交媒體促進(jìn)了人們寫作能力,原因就是C。
(2) 答案:D.George Orwell, the writer.
解釋:本文最后說:His ideal was writing that sounded like speech. We’re getting there at last.
(3) 答案:D.They are appealing to human instincts.
解釋:簡(jiǎn)單的、本能式的反應(yīng)頭腦中想法的信息,很容易被其他人所接受和記住,That’s probably why they are successful.
(4) 答案:B.To mock a bad kind of newspaper prose.
解釋:洋蔥雜志loves parodying newspaper prose, as in this fake news story···