致蔣經(jīng)國(guó)信
經(jīng)國(guó)吾弟:
咫尺之隔,竟成海天之遙。南京匆匆一晤,瞬逾三十六載。幼時(shí)同袍,蘇京把晤,往事歷歷在目。惟長(zhǎng)年未通音問(wèn),此誠(chéng)憾事。近聞?wù)`和,深為懸念。人過(guò)七旬,多有病痛,至盼善自珍攝。
三年以來(lái),我黨一再倡議貴我兩黨舉行談判,同捐前嫌,共竟祖國(guó)統(tǒng)一大業(yè)。惟弟一再聲言“不接觸,不談判,不妥協(xié)”,余期期以為不可。世交深情,于公于私,理當(dāng)進(jìn)言,敬希詮察。
祖國(guó)和平統(tǒng)一,乃千秋功業(yè)。臺(tái)灣終必回歸祖國(guó),早日解決對(duì)各方有利。臺(tái)灣同胞可安居樂(lè)業(yè),兩岸各族人民可解骨肉分離之痛,在臺(tái)諸前輩及大陸去臺(tái)人員亦可各得其所,且有利于亞太地區(qū)局勢(shì)穩(wěn)定和世界和平。吾弟嘗以“計(jì)利當(dāng)計(jì)天下利,求名應(yīng)求萬(wàn)世名”自勉,倘能于吾弟手中成此偉業(yè),必為舉國(guó)尊敬,世人推崇,功在國(guó)家,名留青史。所謂“罪人”之說(shuō),實(shí)相悖謬。局促東隅,終非久計(jì)。明若吾弟,自當(dāng)了然。如遷延不決,或委之異日,不僅徒生困擾,吾弟亦將難辭其咎。再者,和平統(tǒng)一純屬內(nèi)政。外人巧言令色,意在圖我臺(tái)灣,此世人所共知者。當(dāng)斷不斷,必受其亂。愿弟慎思。
孫先生手創(chuàng)之中國(guó)國(guó)民黨,歷盡艱辛,無(wú)數(shù)先烈前仆后繼,終于推翻帝制,建立民國(guó)。光輝業(yè)跡,已成定論。國(guó)共兩度合作,均對(duì)國(guó)家民族作出巨大貢獻(xiàn)。首次合作,孫先生領(lǐng)導(dǎo),吾輩雖幼,亦知一二。再次合作,老先生主其事,吾輩身在其中,應(yīng)知梗概。事雖經(jīng)緯萬(wàn)端,但縱觀全局,合則對(duì)國(guó)家有利,分則必傷民族元?dú)?。今日吾弟在臺(tái)主政,三次合作,大責(zé)難謝。雙方領(lǐng)導(dǎo),同窗摯友,彼此相知,談之更易。所謂“投降”、“屈事”、“吃虧”、“上當(dāng)”之說(shuō),實(shí)難茍同。評(píng)價(jià)歷史,展望未來(lái),應(yīng)天下為公,以國(guó)家民族利益為最高準(zhǔn)則,何發(fā)黨私之論!至于“以三民主義統(tǒng)一中國(guó)”云云,識(shí)者皆以為太不現(xiàn)實(shí),未免自欺欺人。三民主義之真諦,吾輩深知,毋須爭(zhēng)辯。所謂臺(tái)灣“經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮,社會(huì)民主,民生樂(lè)利”等等,在臺(tái)諸公,心中有數(shù),亦毋庸贅言。試為貴黨計(jì),如能依時(shí)順勢(shì),負(fù)起歷史責(zé)任,毅然和談,達(dá)成國(guó)家統(tǒng)一,則兩黨長(zhǎng)期共存,互相監(jiān)督,共圖振興中華之大業(yè)。否則,偏安之局,焉能自保。有識(shí)之士,慮已及此。事關(guān)國(guó)民黨興亡絕續(xù),望弟再思。
近讀大作,有“切望父靈能回到家園與先人同在”之語(yǔ),不勝感慨系之。今老先生仍厝于慈湖,統(tǒng)一之后,即當(dāng)遷安故土,或奉化,或南京、或廬山,以了吾弟孝心。吾弟近曾有言:“要把孝順的心,擴(kuò)大為民族感情,去敬愛(ài)民族,奉獻(xiàn)于國(guó)家。”旨哉斯言,盍不實(shí)踐于統(tǒng)一大業(yè)!就國(guó)家民族而論,蔣氏兩代對(duì)歷史有所交代;就吾弟個(gè)人而言,可謂忠孝兩全。否則,吾弟身后事何以自了。尚望三思。
吾弟一生坎坷,決非命運(yùn)安排,一切操之在己。千秋功罪,系于一念之間。當(dāng)今國(guó)際風(fēng)云變幻莫測(cè),臺(tái)灣上下眾議紛紜。歲月不居,來(lái)日苦短,夜長(zhǎng)夢(mèng)多,時(shí)不我與。盼弟善為抉擇,未雨綢繆。“寥廓海天,不歸何侍?”
人到高年,愈加懷舊,如弟方便,余當(dāng)束裝就道,前往臺(tái)北探望,并面聆諸長(zhǎng)輩教益。“度盡劫波兄弟在,相逢一笑泯恩仇。”遙望南天,不禁神馳,書(shū)不盡言,諸希珍重,佇候復(fù)音。
老夫人前請(qǐng)代為問(wèn)安。方良、緯國(guó)及諸侄不一。
順祝
近祺!
廖承志
一九八二年七月二十四日
A Letter to Chiang Ching-Kuo
24-Jul-82
Dear brother Ching-Kuo,
Who would have expected that the short distance between us should be keeping us poles apart! It is now more than 36 years since our brief encounter in Nanjing. The days we spent together in childhood as well as later in the Soviet capital, however, are still as fresh as ever in my memory. But it's a pity indeed that we haven't heard from each other for so many years. Recently it filled me with much concern to learn of your indisposition. Men aged over seventy are liable to illness. I hope you will take good care of yourself.
For three years, we have repeatedly proposed bilateral talks between the two parties to let bygones be bygones and strive together for the great cause of national reunification. But you have time and again insisted upon having "no contact, no talks and no compromise", which I truly think inadvisable. In view of the public and personal concerns as well as the long-standing deep friendship between our two families, I feel duty-bound to offer you a word of advice for careful consideration.
The peaceful reunification of the motherland will be a great achievement to go down in history. Taiwan is bound to be reunited eventually with the motherland. An early settlement of the problem will be in the interests of all. The compatriots in Taiwan will be able to live in peace and happiness, the people of all nationalities on both sides of the Taiwan straits will be relieved of the pains of separation from their own flesh and blood, and our senior folks in Taiwan and those formerly migrated there from the mainland will all be properly placed and provided for. And, moreover, it will contribute to the stability of Asia and the Pacific region as well as to world peace. You used to seek self-encouragement from the motto, "The interests to be considered should be the interests of all; the fame to be sought should be an everlasting fame." If you should be instrumental in bringing about the great cause of national reunification, you will certainly win esteem and praise nationwide and your meritorious service to the country will earn you a niche in the temple of fame. It is sheer absurdity to think yourself "guilty" for rendering such a service. After all, dragging out your existence in that tight eastern corner is by no means a permanent solution. This should be crystal clear to a man of your wisdom. Procrastination, hesitation or sleeping over the problem will only lead to adversity and you, my brother, will hardly be able to escape censure. Moreover, peaceful reunification is entirely an internal affair of China. As is known to all, outsiders who are talking glibly against it have designs on our Taiwan. To be irresolute when a prompt decision should be taken would only spell disaster. I, therefore, would like you to think this over carefully.
After going through untold hardships during which countless revolutionaries unflinchingly laid down their lives, the Kuomintang founded by Dr. Sun Yat-sen finally overthrew the monarchy and established the republic. This has been universally recognized as a glorious achievement. The Kuomintang and the Communist Party twice cooperated and on both occasions they made tremendous contributions to the country and the nation. We know something about the first cooperation, led by Dr. Sun Yat-sen, though we were still young at that time. The second cooperation was presided over by your father and, as participants in it, we should know what it was all about. Complicated as the matter was, an overall view of the situation will show that united, the country and the nation benefit; divided, they suffer. Now, as head of the Taiwan administration, you have unshirkable responsibility for bringing about the third cooperation. Leaders from both sides will find it easier to talk the matter over since they know each other well, having formerly been schoolmates and close friends. I find it really hard for me to subscribe to those views which describe cooperation as "surrender", "humiliating", "suffering losses" or "being duped". In reviewing history or looking ahead to the future, one should be publicminded and put the interests of the country and the nation above all. Why harp on the narrow interests of a party? Such remarks as "unifying China with the Three People's Principles" are regarded by all thinking people as unrealistic, deceptive and ostrich-like. People of our generation know the true meaning of the Three People's Principles quite well and there is no need to argue about it. Neither is there any need to dwell on such assertions as Taiwan's "economic prosperity, democracy and easy livelihood", the truth of which all gentlemen in Taiwan must be quite aware of. To my mind, if you, for the sake of your party, shoulder the historic task and, going with the stream, take part in peace talks for our national reunification, the two parties will be able to co-exist for a long time to come, supervising each other and making a common effort to revitalize China. Otherwise, content as you are with your present rule over the tight eastern corner, how can such a situation be expected to last for long? This is a question already on the minds of thinking people. It is a matter of survival or extinction for the Kuomintang and I hope you will think it over again.
Recently I was profoundly moved when I read one of your writings in which you expressed the "longing for my father's soul to return to the homeland and be among the forefathers". The remains of your father, now still temporarily placed at Cihu, shall, upon national reunification, be immediately moved to the final resting place in Fenghua, Nanjing or Lushan in fulfilment of your filial wishes. You recently said, "Filial devotion should be expanded into national devotion, which means love of the nation and dedication to the country." Well said! Why don't you apply it to the great cause of national reunification? As far as the country and the nation are concerned, you will have fulfilled the task imposed on you and your father by history; as far as you yourself are concerned, this will be an expression of both loyalty and filial piety. Otherwise how could you account for yourself after your passing away? I hope you will think more about it.
Dear brother, the frustrations marking your lifetime are by no means predestined. You yourself alone are master of your own fate. Merits and demerits to be recorded in history hinge on the decision made in a moment. The present international situation is capricious. Throughout Taiwan people of all strata are talking about their future. Time does not stay and brief is the day. A long night invites bad dreams; time and tide wait for no man. I hope you, my brother, will make a wise choice and repair the house before it rains. "Vast is the expanse of sky and water. What are you waiting for, staying away from home?"
The longing for old friends grows with age. If it suits your convenience, I will pack and go on a visit to Taibei to consult our elders. "For all the disasters the brotherhood has remained; a smile at meeting and enmity is banished." When I look south towards the distant horizon, my heart cannot help going out to my compatriots there. No word is enough to express what I wish to say. It is hoped that you will take good care of yourself. I am looking forward to a reply from you.
Please convey my regards to your mother as well as to Fang-Liang, Wei-Kuo and the children.
Best wishes to you.
Liao Chengzhi
廖承志(1908—1983)1982年7月24日致臺(tái)灣蔣經(jīng)國(guó)信曾由我國(guó)新華社譯成英文電訊稿?,F(xiàn)參閱該電訊稿加以重譯,并附原譯于書(shū)后。