卡梅倫在回憶錄里，談事業(yè)、說家庭

對(duì)鮑里斯·約翰遜的看法

Boris Johnson “didn’t believe” in Brexit, but backed the leave campaign to further his career. Johnson wanted to become the “darling of the party” and “didn’t want to risk allowing someone else with a high profile – Michael Gove in particular – to win that crown”, Cameron claims. “The conclusion I am left with is that he risked an outcome he didn’t believe in because it would help his political career.” Furthermore, Cameron claims Johnson privately believed there should be a second referendum to confirm the terms of Brexit – something Johnson has strongly resisted since. He reveals he tried to stop Johnson joining the Brexit campaign by offering him the post of defence secretary. Johnson, he says, believed the leave camp would lose, and if it did win, there could always be a fresh negotiation followed by a second referendum.

卡梅倫稱，鮑里斯·約翰遜“不贊同”脫歐，但為了仕途發(fā)展選擇了支持脫歐運(yùn)動(dòng)。約翰遜想成為“黨內(nèi)紅人”，“不想冒著讓其他高調(diào)的人——尤其是邁克爾·戈夫——得寵的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”。“我得出的結(jié)論是，他冒著產(chǎn)生自己都不信任的結(jié)果的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，就因?yàn)檫@有助于他的政治生涯。”此外，卡梅倫還指出，約翰遜私下認(rèn)為，應(yīng)該舉行第二次公投來確認(rèn)脫歐條款，而一直以來約翰遜都在強(qiáng)烈抵制脫歐條款?？穫愅嘎?，為了阻止約翰遜加入脫歐大軍，他曾邀請(qǐng)約翰遜擔(dān)任國(guó)防大臣一職。他說，約翰遜認(rèn)為脫歐陣營(yíng)會(huì)失敗，如果脫歐陣營(yíng)勝出，肯定會(huì)開啟新一輪談判，然后再進(jìn)行第二次公投。

His opinions on Michael Gove

對(duì)邁克爾·戈夫的看法

Cameron turns on Michael Gove, once a close friend, in a blistering attack, referring to him as “mendacious”. He reveals he texted Gove: "You are either a team player or a wanker.” He adds: “One quality shone through, disloyalty. Disloyalty to me and, later, disloyalty to Boris”. While Cameron claims Johnson did not believe in Brexit, he says of Gove: “Michael had backed something he did perhaps believe in, but in the process had broken with his friends – while taking up positions that were completely against his political identity.”

卡梅倫在一次激戰(zhàn)中和昔日的好友邁克爾·戈夫反目，并稱其“不誠(chéng)實(shí)”?？穫愅嘎蹲约涸o戈夫發(fā)短信：“你要么是一個(gè)合作伙伴，要么是傻瓜。”他還補(bǔ)充說：“他有一個(gè)突出的品質(zhì)：不忠。過去對(duì)我不忠，后來對(duì)鮑里斯不忠。”盡管卡梅倫稱約翰遜不贊同脫歐，但他卻這樣說戈夫：“邁克爾支持的也許是他相信的東西，但在這一過程中和朋友們決裂了，站在了和自己的政治身份完全相悖的立場(chǎng)上。”

He (partly) regrets the 2016 European referendum

對(duì)2016年舉行的脫歐公投感到遺憾

Cameron has no regrets about calling the referendum, saying it was “necessary” and “inevitable”. But he says he is sorry about the divisions it has caused. He writes that he thinks about the consequences daily and worries “desperately” about what will happen. He claims he was disadvantaged in campaigning for Remain. Both Johnson and Gove “behaved appallingly”, attacking their own government, turning a blind eye to their side’s unpleasant actions. But, as prime minister, Cameron felt he could not hit back as hard, resulting in “asymmetric warfare”. The referendum turned into a Conservative party psychodrama, he writes, and he was “hugely depressed” about leaving his post as prime minister. “I deeply regret the outcome and accept that my approach failed. The decisions I took contributed to that failure. I failed.”

卡梅倫不后悔舉行公投，表示這是“必要的”，也是“不可避免的”。但他說他對(duì)公投引發(fā)的分裂感到遺憾。他寫道，他每天都會(huì)想到公投的后果，“絕望地”擔(dān)憂即將發(fā)生的事情。他表示，作為留歐派自己處于不利地位。約翰遜和戈夫“行為都很可怕”，攻擊自己的政府，無視己方的不當(dāng)行為。但是作為首相，卡梅倫覺得自己不能給予同樣有力的反擊，從而造成了“不對(duì)稱的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)”?？穫悓懙?，公投變成了保守黨的心理劇，對(duì)于離開首相職位他感到“非常沮喪”。“我對(duì)結(jié)果感到非常遺憾，也接受了我的方法失敗的事實(shí)。我做的決定也是導(dǎo)致失敗的因素。我失敗了。”

What he feels about his family

對(duì)家人的感情

Cameron describes his despair at the death of his first-born son Ivan, who died aged six in 2009, and had Ohtahara syndrome, suffering multiple seizures daily. “Nothing, absolutely nothing, can prepare you for the reality of losing your darling boy in this way. It was as if the world stopped turning,” he writes. Then leader of the opposition, he was due to attend prime minister’s questions in the commons on the day after Ivan’s death. But Gordon Brown, whose daughter Jennifer Jane died a few days after birth in 2002, adjourned the house for the day. Cameron writes that Brown’s “real warmth and humanity” meant a lot to both him and wife Samantha.

卡梅倫描述了自己對(duì)長(zhǎng)子伊凡之死的絕望，2009年6歲的伊凡離世，他患有大田原綜合征，每天癲癇發(fā)作多次。他寫道：“沒有任何東西能幫助你承受以這種方式失去心愛兒子的現(xiàn)實(shí)。似乎地球都停止轉(zhuǎn)動(dòng)了。”那時(shí)作為反對(duì)黨的領(lǐng)袖，卡梅倫要在伊凡去世的第二天在下議院出席首相問答。戈登·布朗宣布那天的議會(huì)休會(huì)，他的女兒珍妮弗·簡(jiǎn)在2002年出生后幾天夭折了?？穫悓懙?，布朗的“溫暖和人性”對(duì)他和妻子薩曼莎而言都意義重大。

His proudest moment in office

擔(dān)任首相期間最自豪的時(shí)刻

One of the proudest moments of his premiership, Cameron says, was the introduction of same-sex marriage, though he had worried and “wobbled” over the issue and faced heated opposition within the Conservative party: “Equal marriage was one of the most contentious, hard-fought and divisive issues during my time as prime minister.” One party member tore up his card in front of him. But, he acknowledges, he did regret abstaining from voting on an Iain Duncan Smith motion to block gay couples’ right to adopt children. “I should have proactively supported that right,” he wrote.

卡梅倫說，他擔(dān)任首相期間最自豪的時(shí)刻，就是讓同性戀婚姻合法化，盡管當(dāng)時(shí)他對(duì)同性戀婚姻問題感到憂慮和“搖擺不定”，還面臨保守黨內(nèi)部的激烈反對(duì)：“婚姻平等是我擔(dān)任首相期間最有爭(zhēng)議、斗爭(zhēng)最艱難也是分歧最大的議案之一。”一位黨內(nèi)人士當(dāng)著他的面撕毀了選票。不過，卡梅倫承認(rèn)，他很后悔在給伊恩·鄧肯·史密斯動(dòng)議投票時(shí)棄權(quán)了，這一動(dòng)議阻止同性戀夫婦領(lǐng)養(yǎng)孩子的權(quán)利。他寫道：“我當(dāng)時(shí)應(yīng)該積極支持這一權(quán)利。”