2015年12月5日大陸托?？荚噷懽髡骖}回顧（范文版）

　　小編導(dǎo)語：備考托福的小伙伴們注意了，托福真題是你不可缺少的備考利器，小編給大家整理了剛剛過去的12月5日托?？荚噷懽髡骖}。了解托?？荚嚨膭?dòng)向，有助于我們更好地備考接下來的托?？荚?，趕緊收藏吧!

　　綜合寫作： 罐頭食品是不是導(dǎo)致英國船員鉛中毒和死亡的原因

　　閱讀：

　　1. 罐頭密封性很好，鉛不會(huì)進(jìn)入到食物中去;

　　2. 其他船員沒有報(bào)告這個(gè)現(xiàn)象;

　　3. 還有其他更可能的來源，比如凈化水系統(tǒng)的管道是由鉛做的。

　　聽力反駁：

　　1. 工人由于工作壓力大，會(huì)粗心，導(dǎo)致罐頭密封不好。

　　2. 由鉛引起的頭疼和其他疾病并沒有報(bào)告;

　　3. 鉛管道的凈化系統(tǒng)是給船的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)供水的，喝的和用的水使用其他方法收集的。

　　獨(dú)立寫作：

　　Providing the Internet access is as important as other services, like building roads, so the government should provide it at no cost.

　　是否新題：否

　　考題重復(fù)情況：2015年4月13日大陸考題

　　題材：社會(huì)類

　　觀點(diǎn)： 不同意

　　寫作思路：

　　1. 免費(fèi)提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違反公平原則。

　　2. 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)和其他傳統(tǒng)基礎(chǔ)服務(wù)相比還沒有那么緊要。

　　范文：

　　Many people who live in metropolitan areas often feel that Internet not only is ubiquitous but has become indispensable in their lives. However, I cannot support the argument that government should be responsible for providing Internet service at no cost. The proposed free Internet signifies the government is allowed to ingratiate itself with one class of society at the expense of other taxpayers. Moreover, access to the Internet is simply not as critical as other traditional infrastructure needs.

　　Government subsidized free Internet is a breach of fairness principle. General public should be aware of the fact that any government's Treasury Department only has a finite amount of capital that can be distributed for various public needs. Therefore, the limited amount of public funding should only be allocated in accordance with fairness principle. However, some individuals require use of the Internet more intensive others. The obvious consequence is that the former group of people will be able to utilize the advantage of free Internet; on the other hand, it is detrimental to the latter group's interest. For example, IT professionals may use internet on a 24 twenty-four hour basis in contrast to young kids who may barely touch the computer.

　　Secondly, the assumption that the ability to access the Internet is synonymous with the right to freedom and as important as other infrastructure services is incorrect. There are a few infrastructure services that are essential to people's lives such as water, food and electricity. We cannot live without electricity as people may die without it. On the other hand, although Internet has been playing an important role in our daily lives, the lack of Internet service will only be a little inconvenient. Imagine a patient waiting in the emergency room; the doctor has to have electricity in order to conduct the surgery. But it is only helpful but not necessary for the same doctor to participate in online medical conferences.

　　In conclusion, I think government should not assume the responsibility to offer free Internet service. People should pay for the service based on the amount of their usage.

　　以上就是12月5日托?？荚噷懽鞑糠值恼骖}。