“WHANG—Boom—Boom—cast delicacy to the winds.” Thus Ezra Pound in a letter to his father, urging the old man to help promote his first published collection. It might have been the poet's manifesto.
Pound is as divisive a figure today as he was in his own lifetime. For some he was the leading figure of the Modernist movement who redefined what poetry was and could be; and who, in his role as cultural impresario, gave vital impetus to the literary careers of T. S. Eliot, James Joyce and Wyndham Lewis, among others. But for many Pound remains a freak and an embarrassment, a clinical nutcase and vicious anti-Semite who churned out a lot of impenetrable tosh before losing the plot completely.
During the Second World War he broadcast pro-Fascist radio programmes from Italy and later avoided trial for treason at home only because he was declared insane. On his release from St. Elizabeth's Hospital near Washington, D.C., he returned to Italy (“America is a lunatic asylum”), where he died in 1972 aged 87.
David Moody, emeritus professor of English at York University, makes a strong case for Pound's “generous energy” and the “disruptive, regenerative force of his genius”. His approach (unlike Pound's) is uncontroversial. He follows the poet's progress chronologically from his childhood in Idaho—still, at the time of his birth in 1885, part of the wild west—to his conquest of literary London between 1908 and 1920. He marshals Pound's staggering output of poetry, prose and correspondence to excellent effect, and offers clear, perceptive commentary on it. He helps us to see poems, such as this famous, peculiarly haunting 19-syllable haiku, in a new light:
The apparition of these faces in the crowd:
Petals on a wet, black bough.
That Mr. Moody is constantly being upstaged by the subject of his study is not surprising. Pound was one of the most colourful artistic figures in a period full of them.
According to Ford Madox Ford, who became a good friend of Pound's shortly after the bumptious young American arrived in London: “Ezra would approach with the step of a dancer, making passes with a cane at an imaginary opponent. He would wear trousers made of green billiard cloth, a pink coat, a blue shirt, a tie hand-painted by a Japanese friend, an immense sombrero, a flaming beard cut to a point and a single large blue earring.” W. B. Yeats's simple assessment was that: “There is no younger generation of poets. E. P. is a solitary volcano.”
A great merit of Mr. Moody's approach is the space he gives to Pound's writings. It is love-it-or-hate-it stuff, but, either way, undeniably fascinating. “All good art is realism of one kind or another,” Pound said. Reconciling that tidy statement with practically any of his poems is hard work but, as Mr. Moody shows over and over again, hard work that offers huge rewards. His first volume ends in 1920, with Pound quitting London in a huff, finally fed up—after more than a decade of doing everything in his power to rattle the intellectual establishment—with “British insensitivity to, and irritation with, mental agility in any and every form”. His disgraceful radio programmes and the full blooming of his loopiness lie ahead. So, too, do most of his exquisite Cantos.
1. Pound was a divisive figure in that _____.
[A] he brought both positive and negative effects to the development of the Modernist movement
[B] he was both a poet and a person with mental problem
[C] he was politically a racist while he was also pro-Fascist
[D] he was a man of complex and unintelligible personality
2. When Pound was released from hospital, he returned to Italy because _____.
[A] Italy was his hometown
[B] he was persecuted by Americans
[C] he disliked America
[D] he was out of his mind
3. Which one of the following statements is NOT true of David Moody's study on Pound?
[A] His literary approach is unlike that of Pound's, being less contradictory.
[B] He focuses on Pound's poetry itself instead of his personality, attempting to keep objective.
[C] He traces the poet's life in time order to study Pound's achievement.
[D] His study offers a fresh sight of Pound's work.
4. From Yeats's simple assessment, it can be inferred that _____.
[A] Pound was of exploding power in his literary creation
[B] Pound's achievement could hardly be reached by later poets
[C] Pound's excellence was unsurpassable in his time
[D] it would take a long time for Pound's generation to fully understand him
5. The word “rattle”(Line 5, Last paragraph) most probably means _____.
[A] set up
[B] destroy
[C] struggle
[D] disturb
1. Pound was a divisive figure in that _____.
[A] he brought both positive and negative effects to the development of the Modernist movement
[B] he was both a poet and a person with mental problem
[C] he was politically a racist while he was also pro-Fascist
[D] he was a man of complex and unintelligible personality
1. Pound是一個有爭議的人物,是因為 _____。
[A] 他給現(xiàn)代派運動的發(fā)展同時帶來了積極和消極的影響
[B] 他既是一個詩人,又是一個精神有問題的人
[C] 他在政治上是一個種族主義者,而且還是親法西斯者
[D] 他是一個性格復(fù)雜、讓人無法理解的人
答案:D 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:推理題。文章第二段指出,Pound過去和現(xiàn)在都是個備受爭議的人,有人視他為文學(xué)大師,還有許多人認為他是怪人,是瘋子。從全文來看,他有多面性,在文學(xué)上有巨大成就,而在現(xiàn)實生活中卻有許多奇怪的舉動。這可能都是因為他復(fù)雜的性格,令人非常難以理解。因此,答案為選項D。選項B和C都是他古怪性格和行為的一個方面,并沒有全面地回答題干的問題。而選項A的表述是錯誤的,文章第二段指出他是現(xiàn)代派運動的一個領(lǐng)軍人物,并沒有提及他是否帶來了積極和消極的影響。
2. When Pound was released from hospital, he returned to Italy because _____.
[A] Italy was his hometown
[B] he was persecuted by Americans
[C] he disliked America
[D] he was out of his mind
2. 當(dāng)Pound被從醫(yī)院放出來時,他返回了意大利,是因為 _____。
[A] 意大利是他的故鄉(xiāng)
[B] 他被美國人所迫害
[C] 他不喜歡美國
[D] 他瘋了
答案:C 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆☆
分析:細節(jié)題。文章第三段指出,他返回了意大利,括號中有一句引言:“美國是個瘋子收容所”,這應(yīng)該是他的話。由此可以推斷,是他不喜歡美國,才做出此舉。B,雖然Pound播放親法西斯的廣播節(jié)目,但是他并沒有被拘禁,而是被送到了精神病院,這不能算是迫害。因此,C為正確答案。
3. Which one of the following statements is NOT true of David Moody's study on Pound?
[A] His literary approach is unlike that of Pound's, being less contradictory.
[B] He focuses on Pound's poetry itself instead of his personality, attempting to keep objective.
[C] He traces the poet's life in time order to study Pound's achievement.
[D] His study offers a fresh sight of Pound's work.
3. 關(guān)于David Moody對于Pound的研究,以下哪個陳述是不正確的?
[A] 他的文學(xué)風(fēng)格和Pound的不同,不像后者引起如此大的爭議。
[B] 他重點研究Pound的詩歌本身,而不是Pound的性格,以試圖保持客觀的態(tài)度。
[C] 他以年代為順序來研究Pound的成就。
[D] 他的研究為欣賞Pound的作品提供了新的視角。
答案:A 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:細節(jié)題。選項A,第四段指出,和Pound不同,他的方法并沒有引起爭議。該選項最大的一個錯誤在于,比較的不應(yīng)該是他的文學(xué)風(fēng)格和Pound的文學(xué)風(fēng)格。B,文章第四段最后指出,“(他)整理了Pound令人驚愕的詩歌集、散文和信件,還加上了有條理的、有洞察力的評論”,第七段的開頭指出,“Moody先生的研究的最大特點就是他給Pound的作品留下想象空間。這是個‘愛他或恨他’的故事,但是不管如何,那迷人的色彩是不容置疑的”,可見他力圖保持客觀的態(tài)度。C,第四段提到,他按時間順序研究了Pound的經(jīng)歷,該陳述正確。D,第四段也提到了這一點。因此,選項A為正確答案。
4. From Yeats's simple assessment, it can be inferred that _____.
[A] Pound was of exploding power in his literary creation
[B] Pound's achievement could hardly be reached by later poets
[C] Pound's excellence was unsurpassable in his time
[D] it would take a long time for Pound's generation to fully understand him
4. 從Yeats的簡短評論中可以推斷出 _____。
[A] Pound的文學(xué)創(chuàng)作充滿了爆炸性的力量
[B] Pound的成就是后來的詩人們很難達到的
[C] Pound的出色表現(xiàn)在他那個時代是無人企及的
[D] 與Pound同時代的人還需要很長時間才能徹底理解他
答案:C 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆☆
分析:推理題。Yeats對他的評價是:“沒有更年輕的一代詩人了,Pound是座孤獨的火山。”他的意思是,在當(dāng)時只有Pound可以獨樹一幟,無人能及。因此,選項C最為符合題意。選項A有一定的迷惑性,因為原文中的“火山”一詞有可能會誤導(dǎo)考生選擇“爆炸性的力量”,但該句的重點是評價Pound的獨特性。B和D兩個選項其實都與Yeats的評論內(nèi)容無關(guān)。
5. The word “rattle” (Line 5, Last paragraph) most probably means _____.
[A] set up
[B] destroy
[C] struggle
[D] disturb
5. rattle這個詞(最后一段第五行)最有可能的意思為 _____。
[A] 建立
[B] 摧毀
[C] 奮斗
[D] 擾亂
答案:D 難度系數(shù):☆
分析:猜詞題。根據(jù)上下文,Pound最終對英國對新的精神不感興趣的態(tài)度感到憤怒,可以推斷他自己是一個創(chuàng)新者,希望為英國的知識界帶來一些新的氣息,結(jié)果卻失敗了。那么,他的這種新意對已經(jīng)存在的知識界應(yīng)該是一種不同的東西,產(chǎn)生了一種擾亂的效果,因此,選項D最為符合。
“砰砰——轟轟——轟轟——把精致扔到風(fēng)中。”在Ezra Pound寫給父親的一封信中,他要求父親幫助他宣傳自己出版的第一本詩集,而這可能就是這位詩人的宣言。
Pound在他生活的時代是一個有爭議的人物,直至今日仍然如此。對于一些人來說,他是現(xiàn)代主義運動的領(lǐng)軍人物,他重新定義了什么是詩歌及詩歌應(yīng)該是什么等問題;而作為文化發(fā)起人,他大力推進了T. S. Eliot、James Joyce和Wyndham Lewis等人的文學(xué)事業(yè)。但是,對于許多人來說,Pound還是一個怪誕的人、一個讓人窘迫的人、一個瘋子、一個反閃米特人的惡人,在他的陰謀徹底流產(chǎn)前還說了許多不可理喻的瘋話。
二戰(zhàn)期間,他播放了來自意大利的親法西斯的廣播節(jié)目,而后因被診斷為瘋子才在家躲過了叛國罪的審訊。當(dāng)他從華盛頓特區(qū)附近的圣·伊麗莎白醫(yī)院被放出來時,他就回到了意大利(“美國是瘋子收容所”),在那里他活到了87歲,于1972年去世。
David Moody是約克大學(xué)的英語榮譽教授,他找到了強有力的證據(jù)證明Pound“充沛的精力”和“他天才的分裂性的再生力量”。與Pound不同的是,他的方法是沒有爭議的。他先是按年代上溯至這位詩人在愛達荷州度過的童年(1885年他出生時,愛達荷州還是拓荒前的美國西部),然后一直追蹤到他于1908年至1920年征服了倫敦文學(xué)界的經(jīng)歷。Moody整理了Pound令人驚愕的詩歌集、散文和信件,還加上了有條理、有洞察力的評論。他幫助我們用一種新的眼光來讀詩,比如下面這首著名的、令人難以忘懷的19音節(jié)俳句:
人群中這些面容的出現(xiàn):
濕漉漉的黑色樹枝上的花瓣。
Moody先生一直以他所研究的課題而自豪,這一點都不奇怪。在藝術(shù)家輩出的年代里,Pound是最多彩的藝術(shù)家之一。
Ford Madox Ford在這個傲慢的美國年輕人到達倫敦后不久就和他成了好朋友,F(xiàn)ord說:“Ezra常踏著舞步過來,而且還用拐杖與假想敵激戰(zhàn),為自己開路。他常穿綠色的呢絨褲,粉色上衣,藍色襯衫,打一條一個日本朋友手繪的領(lǐng)帶,戴一頂特大的寬邊帽,火紅的胡須修到只剩下一點,還戴著一只很大的藍色耳環(huán)。”W. B. Yeats的簡單評價是:“沒有更年輕的一代詩人了,Ezra Pound是座孤獨的火山。”
Moody先生的研究的最大特點就是他給Pound的作品留下想象空間。這是個“愛他或恨他”的故事,但是不管如何,那迷人的色彩是不容置疑的。“所有好的藝術(shù)都是一種這樣或那樣的現(xiàn)實主義。”Pound說。將他的任何詩歌與整齊的陳述協(xié)調(diào)起來難度確實很大,但是Moody先生一次又一次地證明了,難度越大的工作,回報也越多。Pound的第一本詩集1920年才寫完,他一怒之下離開了倫敦,在用盡自己力量震動知識界十多年后,他終于厭倦了“英國人對于任何形式的精神活力都不在乎、甚至感到惱火”。他不光彩的廣播節(jié)目以及他的瘋狂表現(xiàn)了出來,一同展現(xiàn)出來的,還有他大部分優(yōu)美的詩歌。