For most of his life Chuck Feeney has guarded his privacy obsessively. When he became a philanthropist, his gifts came on condition that his name never appeared on any press release or plaque; all donations would cease if confidentiality was breached. But when he decided to co-operate with Conor O'Clery on this book, many of the people in his life, released from their Trappist vows, let themselves go. The result is gripping.
An Irish-American, born in New Jersey in 1931, Mr. Feeney made a fortune by co-founding Duty Free Shoppers (DFS) which first sold tax-exempt goods to American soldiers abroad and then tapped into the rise of mass tourism. When DFS was sold in 1997, it had delivered nearly $8 billion to its four main shareholders, of which Mr. Feeney was the joint biggest, with 38.75% .
Tax avoidance is the flip side to Mr. Feeney's philanthropic coin. He is addicted to it. “Chuck hates taxes. He believes people can do more with money than governments can,” says a friend. In 1964 a young New York lawyer, Harvey Dale, told Mr. Feeney that changes in the tax laws threatened his business, which was running risks that could put the founders in jail. On his advice, Mr. Feeney and his co-founder, Robert Miller, transferred ownership to their foreign-born wives, from France and Ecuador, respectively. In 1974, through a deal with the American government, the firm turned the Pacific island of Saipan into a tax haven. Then, in 1978, Mr. Feeney grouped his various investments, including his shares of DFS, in a holding company, General Atlantic Group Limited, in tax-free Bermuda. To escape the American taxman, everything was still registered in his wife's name.
Mr. Feeney carefully shunned all outward evidence of wealth. But as soon as DFS became reliably profitable, he started the practice of giving 5% of his pre-tax profits to good causes. In 1982 he created a foundation, the Atlantic Philanthropies, based in Bermuda. Two years later he signed over his fortune to the foundation, except for sums set aside for his wife and children. His net worth fell below $5m. When he broke the news to his children, he gave them each a copy of Andrew Carnegie's essay on wealth, written in 1889.
Mr. Feeney has given his alma mater, Cornell University, more than $600m, dwarfing all other donations from a single alumnus to an American university. He has contributed hundreds of millions of dollars towards higher education in Ireland, South Africa and Australia. He has helped with health care in Vietnam. In 2004 he went to Cuba, where he met Fidel Castro, who seemed only too happy to accept his capitalist-tax-avoided dollars. But it was his support for the Irish peace process that caused the most controversy, including accusations (without foundation, it turned out) that he had financed the IRA.
Mr. Feeney is committed to giving away all the money in his foundation by a fixed date—thought to be in about ten years—but his investment prowess makes this difficult. Currently, Atlantic Philanthropies is worth $4 billion (up from $3.5 billion in 2001) even though, over its lifetime, it has given away about $4 billion in increasing amounts. The trouble for Mr. Feeney is that the foundation's assets are growing as fast as he tries to get rid of them.
1. When Chuck decided to co-operate with Conor O'Clery on this book, many of the people in his life _____.
[A] left Chuck for ever
[B] broke their previous promises of maintaining confidentiality
[C] talked about what they knew about Chuck
[D] felt surprised and then disappointed about Chuck
2. Mr. Feeney was dedicated to avoiding tax because _____.
[A] he wanted to make more money
[B] he wanted to give more money to good causes
[C] he thought the government was corrupted
[D] he thought people could manage the society with their own money by themselves
3. Pacific island of Saipan _____ through a deal with the American government in 1974.
[A] made favorable tax policy for Mr. Feeney's firm
[B] established a branch of DFS
[C] became a tax-free place
[D] became a heaven for tax-free business
4. Which one of the following statements is NOT true of Mr. Feeney's charity activities?
[A] He made huge donations to Cornell University.
[B] He contributed money to higher education.
[C] He supported the health care in Vietnam.
[D] He financed the IRA for the Irish peace process.
5. It is difficult for Mr. Feeney to give away all the money in his foundation in about ten years since _____.
[A] he has made too much investment elsewhere to take back the money
[B] the foundation's assets are increasing too fast to be completely given away
[C] he has trouble in finding reliable means to donate all the money
[D] ten years is too long for him to give away all the money
1. When Chuck decided to co-operate with Conor O'Clery on this book, many of the people in his life _____.
[A] left Chuck for ever
[B] broke their previous promises of maintaining confiden-tiality
[C] talked about what they knew about Chuck
[D] felt surprised and then disappointed about Chuck
1. 當(dāng)Chuck決定和Conor O'Clery合作撰寫這本書時,他周圍的許多人 _____。
[A] 永遠(yuǎn)離開了Chuck
[B] 打破了自己曾經(jīng)許下的保密諾言
[C] 談?wù)撍麄兯赖腃huck
[D] 對Chuck先是感到驚訝,然后是失望
答案:C 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:推理題。第一段提到Chuck一直在保護(hù)自己的隱私,但提到合作寫這本書時用了轉(zhuǎn)折詞,由此可以推斷這次他并沒有緘口,他周圍的許多人也因此可以隨意談?wù)撍麄兯赖腃hunk。選項(xiàng)C符合題意。選項(xiàng)A和D是明顯錯誤的,而選項(xiàng)B是一個較強(qiáng)的干擾選項(xiàng),其錯誤在于,這些人不是打破了自己的諾言,而是現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)沒有必要再遵守諾言了,因此連Chunk自己都已經(jīng)開金口了。
2. Mr. Feeney was dedicated to avoiding tax because _____.
[A] he wanted to make more money
[B] he wanted to give more money to good causes
[C] he thought the government was corrupted
[D] he thought people could manage the society with their own money by themselves
2. Feeney先生竭力避稅,是因?yàn)?_____。
[A] 他想要賺更多的錢
[B] 他想要將更多的錢投入公益事業(yè)
[C] 他認(rèn)為政府是腐敗的
[D] 他認(rèn)為人們可以用自己的錢自己來管理社會
答案:D 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆☆
分析:細(xì)節(jié)題。第三段提到,F(xiàn)eeney先生對免稅上了癮,因?yàn)樗J(rèn)為人們用錢可以比政府辦更多的事情,因此,選項(xiàng)D最為符合題意。C,作者并未提到政府腐敗,只是提到人們用錢可以比政府辦更多的事情。
3. Pacific island of Saipan _____ through a deal with the American government in 1974.
[A] made favorable tax policy for Mr. Feeney's firm
[B] established a branch of DFS
[C] became a tax-free place
[D] became a heaven for tax-free business
3. 通過和美國政府于1974年達(dá)成的一個協(xié)議,太平洋 上的塞班島 _____。
[A] 為Feeney先生的公司制定了有利的稅收政策
[B] 建立了其免稅店的一個分店
[C] 成為免稅的地方
[D] 成為免稅商業(yè)活動的天堂
答案:C 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆☆
分析:推理題。文章第三段提到,F(xiàn)eeney先生為了避免法律的麻煩,把免稅店轉(zhuǎn)到了妻子名下,而后來又同美國政府達(dá)成協(xié)議,把塞班島變成了一個“稅收避難所”,也就是免稅的地方。選項(xiàng)C為正確答案。選項(xiàng)A是錯誤的,因?yàn)槿鄭u成為免稅的地方是通過同美國政府達(dá)成的協(xié)議實(shí)現(xiàn)的,并沒有專門為Feeney先生的公司制定政策。選項(xiàng)B顯然是錯誤的,因?yàn)椴粌H僅是開一個免稅店的分店那么簡單,而是整個島都變成了免稅的地方。選項(xiàng)D有一定的干擾性,雖然小島上都是免稅的,但是沒有證據(jù)表明它成為了免稅商業(yè)活動的天堂。
4. Which one of the following statements is NOT true of Mr. Feeney's charity activities?
[A] He made huge donations to Cornell University.
[B] He contributed money to higher education.
[C] He supported the health care in Vietnam.
[D] He financed the IRA for the Irish peace process.
4. 關(guān)于Feeney先生的慈善行為,下列哪個陳述是錯誤的?
[A] 他為康奈爾大學(xué)捐獻(xiàn)了巨額款項(xiàng)。
[B] 他為高等教育捐資。
[C] 他資助越南的衛(wèi)生事業(yè)。
[D] 他因?yàn)閻蹱柼m的和平進(jìn)程而資助了愛爾蘭共和軍。
答案:D 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:細(xì)節(jié)題。選項(xiàng)A、B和C在文章第五段中都有所涉及,即“Feeney先生捐給自己的母??的螤柎髮W(xué)的資金達(dá)六億多美元,這個數(shù)額超過了美國所有大學(xué)畢業(yè)生個人捐款的總額。他還捐獻(xiàn)了幾億美元用于愛爾蘭、南非和澳大利亞的高等教育。此外,他也資助了越南的衛(wèi)生保健事業(yè)。2004年,他來到古巴,在那里會見了菲德爾·卡斯特羅,卡斯特羅非常高興,但并未接受Feeney先生通過避稅得來的錢”。選項(xiàng)D,他資助了愛爾蘭的和平進(jìn)程,但是文章指出,說他資助了愛爾蘭共和軍是沒有根據(jù)的。因此,選項(xiàng)D為正確答案。
5. It is difficult for Mr Feeney to give away all the money in his foundation in about ten years since _____.
[A] he has made too much investment elsewhere to take back the money
[B] the foundation's assets are increasing too fast to be completely given away
[C] he has trouble in finding reliable means to donate all the money
[D] ten years is too long for him to give away all the money
5. Feeney先生要在10年內(nèi)將自己基金會的所有資產(chǎn)捐出,這有一定的難度,是因?yàn)?_____。
[A] 他在其他地方投資太多,無法把錢收回來
[B] 該基金會的資產(chǎn)增長過快,不能及時全部捐出
[C] 他在尋找可靠的捐錢途徑方面碰到了問題
[D] 10年對于他捐出所有的資產(chǎn)來說太長了
答案:B 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:細(xì)節(jié)題。文章最后一段提到,他的投資能力不斷增加,基金會的資產(chǎn)也不斷增加,所以要把錢全部捐出去還是個困難。因此選項(xiàng)B是符合這個意思的。其他三個選項(xiàng)都與文章內(nèi)容無關(guān),屬于無中生有。
Chuck Feeney在一生的大部分時間里,都竭盡全力保護(hù)自己的私生活不受干擾。在成為一個慈善家后,他在捐贈時提出的條件就是,自己的名字不能出現(xiàn)在任何新聞稿或匾額上。如果違反了這種機(jī)密約定,他就會終止捐贈。但是當(dāng)他決定要和Conor O'Clery合作寫本書時,他周圍的許多人都得以打破緘口的誓言,從而可以暢所欲言了。這個結(jié)果真是夠吸引人的。
Feeney先生是一位美籍愛爾蘭人,1931年出生在新澤西州。他和人共同創(chuàng)辦了免稅店而發(fā)了大財,該免稅店最開始是向那些在國外的美國士兵出售免稅商品。后來隨著旅游者的增多,其業(yè)務(wù)也轉(zhuǎn)向了他們。1997年賣掉免稅店時,四個大股東得到了近80億美元,而Feeney是最大的股東,他占有的份額為38.75%。
免稅只是Feeney先生慈善事業(yè)的另一面而已。他甚至對免稅上了癮。“Chuck憎恨稅收。他認(rèn)為人們用錢可以比政府能辦更多的事情。”他的一位朋友說。1964年,一位年輕的紐約律師Harvey Dale告訴Feeney先生,稅收法的改革會威脅到他的生意,甚至可能會讓這些創(chuàng)辦者們鋃鐺入獄。在他的建議下,F(xiàn)eeney和他的合伙人Robert Miller將免稅店的所有權(quán)移交給了他們分別出生在法國和厄瓜多爾的妻子。1974年,通過與美國政府達(dá)成的一項(xiàng)協(xié)議,公司將位于太平洋上的塞班島變成了一個免稅的地方。1978年,F(xiàn)eeney先生把自己的各種投資都集合起來,包括他在免稅店的股份,然后投進(jìn)了一家在不收稅的百慕大群島成立的控股公司——通用大西洋有限公司。為了躲避美國的收稅員,所有公司仍舊以他妻子的名義注冊。
Feeney先生小心地抹去了自己財產(chǎn)的所有表面證據(jù)。但是當(dāng)他確定免稅店已經(jīng)贏利的時候,他開始將自己稅前利潤的5%用于慈善事業(yè)。1982年,他創(chuàng)立了一個基金會——大西洋慈善事業(yè),總部設(shè)在百慕大。兩年后,他自己的財產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)到該基金會,只留了一些給妻子和孩子。他的凈資產(chǎn)從而降到了500萬美元以下。當(dāng)他告訴孩子們這個消息時,他送給每個孩子一篇卡耐基于1889年寫的關(guān)于財富的文章。
Feeney先生捐給自己的母校康奈爾大學(xué)的資金達(dá)六億多美元,這個數(shù)額超過了美國所有大學(xué)畢業(yè)生個人捐款的總額。他還捐獻(xiàn)了幾億美元用于愛爾蘭、南非和澳大利亞的高等教育。此外,他也資助了越南的衛(wèi)生保健事業(yè)。2004年,他來到古巴,在那里會見了菲德爾·卡斯特羅,卡斯特羅非常高興,但并未接受Feeney先生通過避稅得來的錢。但是正是由于他對愛爾蘭和平運(yùn)動的支持,才引發(fā)了最大的爭議,人們指責(zé)他資助了愛爾蘭共和軍(事實(shí)上毫無根據(jù))。
Feeney先生致力于在某一固定日期前把所有財產(chǎn)投入其基金會(可能會在大約10年以后),但是他的投資能力卻為這項(xiàng)任務(wù)增加了困難。目前,“大西洋慈善”價值40億美元(而在2001年只有35億),這是在已經(jīng)累計捐出了40億美元之后的數(shù)字。Feeney目前面臨的問題是,基金會資產(chǎn)增長的速度和他捐錢的速度幾乎是齊頭并進(jìn)的。