特朗普的經(jīng)濟計劃真會造福勞動階級？

Following a brief market plunge, the President-elect’s speech on Tuesday night was more conciliatory than many expected and emphasised his commitment to infrastructure investment. Investors have, on balance, concluded that the combination of a shift to very expansionary fiscal policy and major reductions in regulation in sectors ranging from energy to finance to drug pricing will raise demand and reflate the American economy.

在短暫的市場暴跌后，當選總統(tǒng)特朗普在上周二晚的演講比很多人預期的更加溫和，強調(diào)了他對基礎設施投資的承諾?？偟膩碚f，投資者的結論是，向極具擴張性的財政政策轉變、結合大幅削減對從能源到金融再到藥品定價等多個領域的監(jiān)管，將促進需求并刺激美國經(jīng)濟。

The result has been a rise in real interest rates and inflation expectations, along with a strong stock market and a strong dollar. Experience suggests, however, that initial market responses to major political events are poor predictors of their ultimate impact.

結果是實際利率和通脹預期上升，同時股市走高、美元表現(xiàn)強勁。然而，經(jīng)驗表明，市場對于重大政治事件的最初反應，通常無法準確預示事件的最終影響。

The late MIT economist Rudiger Dornbusch made an extensive study of the results of populist economic programmes around the world, finding that while they sometimes had immediate positive results, over the medium- and long-term they were catastrophic for the working class in whose name they were launched. This could be the fate of the Trump programme given its design errors, implausible assumptions and reckless disregard for global economics.

已故的麻省理工學院(MIT)經(jīng)濟學家魯?shù)细?bull;多恩布施(Rudiger Dornbusch)在廣泛研究了世界各地民粹主義經(jīng)濟計劃的結果后發(fā)現(xiàn)，盡管這些計劃有時會產(chǎn)生立竿見影的正面結果，但是從中期和長期來看，這些打著造福勞動階級旗號推出的計劃會對勞動階級造成災難性的打擊。鑒于特朗普計劃的設計錯誤、不合理的假設以及對全球經(jīng)濟狀況的草率忽視，特朗普計劃可能也會難逃這樣的命運。

I have long been a strong advocate of debt-financed public investment in the context of low interest rates and a decaying US infrastructure, so I was glad to see Mr Trump emphasise it. Unfortunately, the plan presented by his advisers, Peter Navarro and Wilbur Ross, suggests an approach based on tax credits for equity investment and total private sector participation that will not cover the most important projects, not reach many of the most important investors, and involve substantial mis-targeting of public resources.

我長期以來一直非常贊成在利率水平較低以及美國基礎設施陳舊的背景下，以債務融資進行公共投資。因此，看到特朗普強調(diào)這一點我很高興。遺憾的是，他的顧問彼得•納瓦羅(Peter Navarro)和威爾伯•羅斯(Wilbur Ross)提出的方案表明，該計劃的實現(xiàn)方式將基于為股權投資和全體私人部門參與提供稅務抵免，不會覆蓋一些最重要的項目、觸及不到很多最重要的投資者、并且將涉及公共資源的大量錯配。

Many of the highest return infrastructure investments — such as improving roads, repairing 60,000 structurally deficient bridges, upgrading schools or modernising the air traffic control system — do not generate a commercial return and so are excluded from his plan. Nor can the non-taxable pension funds, endowments and sovereign wealth funds that are the most promising sources of capital for infrastructure take advantage of the program.

很多回報最高的基礎設施投資——比如改善道路狀況、修復60000座存在結構性缺陷的危橋、升級學校設施和空中交通管制系統(tǒng)——不會帶來商業(yè)回報，因此被排除在特朗普的計劃之外。享受免稅待遇的養(yǎng)老基金、捐贈基金和主權財富基金這類最有可能為基礎設施提供資金的機構，也無法受益于該計劃。

I am optimistic regarding the efficacy of fiscal expansion. But any responsible economist has to recognise that, past a point, it can lead to some combination of excessive foreign borrowing, inflation and even financial crisis. As Dornbusch showed, in emerging markets this can happen quite quickly. In the US the process would take longer.

我看好財政擴張的效果。但是任何負責的經(jīng)濟學家都不得不承認，超過某個度，財政擴張可能會導致出現(xiàn)以下三種情況中的一種或多種：外債過高、通脹、甚至是金融危機。正如多恩布施表明的那樣，在新興市場，這種局面可能會很快形成。在美國，該過程耗時會更長。

Even without taking account of the likely costs of the infrastructure plan (which the Trump team badly underestimates) or the propodefenceense build-up, the Trump tax reform proposals are too expensive. Many, like the proposed abolition of the estate tax, will only benefit the high-saving wealthy.

即使不考慮特朗普的基礎設施計劃(特朗普團隊嚴重低估了該計劃的成本)以及鞏固國防提議的可能成本，特朗普的稅制改革提議也太過昂貴了。就像廢除遺產(chǎn)稅的提議一樣，很多提議只會有益于儲蓄率較高的富人。

While drastic changes in the proposed domestic programme are necessary for it to work, the general direction of increasing public investment, reforming taxes and adjusting regulation is appropriate. The same cannot be said of Mr Trump’s global plan, which rests on a misunderstanding of how the world economy operates.

盡管特朗普針對國內(nèi)事務所提出的計劃需要做出劇烈改變才能奏效，但是該計劃增加公共投資、改革稅制以及調(diào)整監(jiān)管的總體方向是恰當?shù)摹Ｌ乩势蔗槍θ虻挠媱潉t不然，后者是基于他對世界經(jīng)濟運行方式的錯誤理解。

Consider the immediate effects of Mr Trump’s victory. The Mexican peso has depreciated about 10 per cent relative to the dollar over fears of new protectionist policies, and many other emerging market currencies have also fallen sharply. The impact of this change is to raise the cost of anything the US exports to Mexico and to lower the cost of anything Mexico exports to the US.

考慮一下特朗普獲勝后的直接影響。由于市場擔心美國會出臺新的保護主義政策，墨西哥比索兌美元匯率下跌約10%，很多其他新興市場貨幣也急劇下跌。這一變化的影響是增加了美國向墨西哥出口任何東西的成本、而降低了墨西哥向美國出口任何東西的成本。

It will also make Mexico and other emerging markets much cheaper relative to the US for global companies. So US workers, particularly in manufacturing, will see increased pressure.

對于全球企業(yè)而言，這還將使墨西哥和其他新興市場相對美國的成本更加低廉。因此美國的工人(特別是制造業(yè)工人)，將承受更大壓力。

The plan seems to assume that we can pressure countries not to let their currencies depreciate, as suggested by the intention to have the new treasury secretary name China as an exchange rate manipulator. This is ludicrous. While there are reasonable arguments that China manipulated its exchange rate for commercial advantage in the past, the reality is that for the past year the country has intervened to prop up its exchange rate. The same is true of most emerging markets. Not even US presidents with political mandates can repeal the laws of economics.

該計劃似乎假定我們可以迫使他國不讓其貨幣貶值，正如特朗普讓新財長把中國定為匯率操縱國的打算所顯示的那樣。這是荒唐的。盡管有合理證據(jù)表明中國過去曾為了貿(mào)易利益而操縱匯率，但是事實是中國過去一年一直通過干預支撐人民幣匯率。大多數(shù)新興市場也是一樣。即便是擁有政治授權的美國總統(tǒng)也不能推翻經(jīng)濟規(guī)律。

Populist economics will play out differently in the US than in emerging markets. But the results will be no better. All with a stake in the global economy must hope that now, as has happened often in the past, a US president faced with the responsibility of governing preserves the valid core of campaign economic plans while making major adjustments.

在美國實施民粹主義經(jīng)濟計劃的過程將不同于在新興市場實施同類計劃的過程。但是結果會一樣糟糕。如今，所有參與全球經(jīng)濟的國家肯定都期望，正如過去通常的情況一樣，面對治理責任的美國總統(tǒng)可以在保留競選經(jīng)濟綱領中站得住腳的核心要素的同時，對該綱領做出重大調(diào)整。

The writer is Charles W Eliot university professor at Harvard and a former US Treasury secretary

本文作者為哈佛大學(Harvard University)查爾斯•W•艾略特大學教授(Charles W. Eliot university professor)、曾擔任美國財政部長