英國大學(xué)排名下滑因?yàn)檎惺崭喔F學(xué)生？
British universities are slipping down the world rankings, with experts blaming the decline on pressure to admit more disadvantaged students.
英國大學(xué)的世界排行下滑，專家將其歸咎于招收更多窮學(xué)生的壓力。
Cambridge University, which for many years was ranked the best in the world and for a decade held a place in the top three, has now dropped down to fifth place, according to the QS World University Rankings.
在QS世界大學(xué)排行榜上，劍橋大學(xué)曾多年排名世界第一，最近10年以來也一直保持在前三位，但如今，劍橋大學(xué)卻降至第五名。
Overall, 51 of the UK’s 76 institutions have slipped down in the rankings since last year. The Russell Group members, which represents 24 of the UK's most selective universities, including Oxford and Cambridge, saw 16 dropping down in the rankings.
總體來看，英國的76所高校中有51所的排名相比去年有所下降。代表牛津大學(xué)和劍橋大學(xué)等英國24所頂尖大學(xué)的羅素大學(xué)集團(tuán)中有16所排名下滑。
Professor Alan Smithers, who is head of the centre for education and employment at the University of Buckingham, said that the decline was because “universities are no longer free to take their own decisions and recruit the most talented students which would ensure top positions in league tables”.
白金漢大學(xué)教育和就業(yè)中心主任艾倫•史密瑟斯教授說，排名下滑是因?yàn)?ldquo;大學(xué)無法再自由地做決定，招收最有才華的學(xué)生，而只有這樣才能讓大學(xué)保住在排行榜中的高位。”
He said that instead, universities are forced to comply with “all sorts of requirements in terms of the ethnic mix, the levels of income of the students and whether they come from low income areas”.
他說，如今大學(xué)被迫滿足“各種要求，關(guān)于種族融合、學(xué)生收入水平，以及是否來自低收入地區(qū)”。
Under the current fees system, any English university wishing to charge tuition fees of over around £6,000 must have an access agreement approved by Offa. This sets out what the university intends to do to recruit and retain youngsters who would not normally study for a degree.
在當(dāng)前的收費(fèi)制度下，任何想收取超6000英鎊學(xué)費(fèi)的大學(xué)，都必須有公平入學(xué)辦公室通過的準(zhǔn)入?yún)f(xié)議。這一協(xié)議規(guī)定了大學(xué)為招收和留住那些沒條件攻讀學(xué)位的年輕人所計(jì)劃采取的措施。
Earlier this year, the higher education tsar warned that top universities must make more effort to accept poor students.
今年早些時(shí)候，公平入學(xué)辦公室警告說，頂尖大學(xué)必須作出更多努力來接納貧窮學(xué)生。
Les Ebdon, director of Offa said that the argument used by admissions tutors that disadvantaged students’ grades are not high enough “just doesn’t hold water”, and criticised the Russell Group for suggesting that there is a limit on the numbers of poorer teenagers they can recruit.
公平入學(xué)辦公室主任萊斯•艾伯頓說，招生人員聲稱窮學(xué)生的分?jǐn)?shù)不夠高的論斷“站不住腳”，并批評了羅素大學(xué)集團(tuán)，指出他們對于家貧的青少年有招收人數(shù)限制。
Prof Smithers said that Britain’s top universities are under pressure to recruit more disadvantaged students, and that this “has diverted their attention from really providing the subjects and the fields that they feel are the most appropriate and drawing in the best students”.
史密瑟斯教授說，英國頂尖大學(xué)被迫招收更多窮學(xué)生，這“讓他們分心，無法提供最合適的學(xué)科和研究領(lǐng)域，也無法招收最優(yōu)秀的學(xué)生。”
“If the premier league made all sorts of requirements about recruiting left footed and right footed players, the teams wouldn’t be quite as successful,” he said.
他說：“如果英超聯(lián)賽對于招收左腳或右腳踢球的球員有各種規(guī)定，那么球隊(duì)就不會那么成功。”
“This interference is getting in the way of the purpose of universities which is identifying the most talented students and taking them to the frontier of their subject,” he said.
“這種干預(yù)已經(jīng)阻礙了大學(xué)的發(fā)展目標(biāo)，而大學(xué)的初衷是要發(fā)現(xiàn)最有才華的學(xué)生，把他們推向各自學(xué)科的前沿。”
QS, which has compiled the global university rankings since 2004, ranks institutions according to six metrics: academic reputation, employer reputation, faculty to student ratio, citations per faculty, the international faculty ratio and the international student ratio.
QS自2004年開始進(jìn)行全球大學(xué)排名，排名主要依據(jù)6個(gè)衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)：學(xué)術(shù)聲譽(yù)、雇主聲譽(yù)、師生數(shù)比、教職員論文引用率、國際教師比例和國際學(xué)生比例。
Dr Joanna Williams, a senior lecturer in higher education at the University of Kent, said: “Universities are casting the net a lot wider and reaching out to more socially diverse groups, which is good.
肯特大學(xué)高等教育部高級講師喬安娜•威廉姆斯博士說：“大學(xué)正在廣撒網(wǎng)，觸及更多不同的社會群體，這是件好事。”
“But it means you can’t assume that students come in with a body of knowledge and you have to spend a certain amount of time bringing them up to standard”. Dr Williams added that universities are giving lower A-level offers – not just to disadvantaged students but to all students – in order to fill places.
“但這意味著你不能指望學(xué)生剛進(jìn)來就有一套知識體系，你必須花一定時(shí)間才能讓他們達(dá)到標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。”威廉姆斯補(bǔ)充道，大學(xué)為了招滿學(xué)生，不光向窮學(xué)生放低招收標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，而是對所有學(xué)生都放低標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
“The assumptions you would have had in the past like telling students to go away and read the book or write the essay, are no longer there,” she said. “Universities are becoming more like schools in teaching style, and that removes a lot of the intellectual challenge.”
“過去大學(xué)老師會讓學(xué)生自己去看書或?qū)懻撐?，但現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)不能這么想當(dāng)然了，”她說，“大學(xué)變得更像是上課的學(xué)校，這讓本應(yīng)有的許多學(xué)術(shù)挑戰(zhàn)消失了。”
Baroness Alison Wolf, a cross-bench peer and professor of public policy at King’s College London, said that while British universities are relatively well-funded, their American competitors have “been spending more and more” in recent years.
中立議員、倫敦大學(xué)國王學(xué)院公共政策系教授艾莉森•沃爾夫女男爵說，雖然英國的大學(xué)資金還算充裕，但是美國大學(xué)近年來的“投資越來越大”。
“If we are slipping through the ranks it is partly that other countries are pouring money into higher education,” she said. “Governments all over the world are obsessed with the idea of having world class universities.”
她說：“如果我們的排名下滑，一部分原因是其他國家在高等教育上投入了大量資金。世界各國的政府都很看重國內(nèi)是否有世界一流大學(xué)。”
The top ten universities according to QS World University Rankings 2018
QS2018世界大學(xué)排行榜前十名：
1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 麻省理工學(xué)院
2 Standford University 斯坦福大學(xué)
3 Harvard University 哈佛大學(xué)
4 California Institute of Technology 加州理工學(xué)院
5 University of Cambridge 劍橋大學(xué)
6 University of Oxford 牛津大學(xué)
7 University College London 倫敦大學(xué)學(xué)院
8 Imperial College London 倫敦大學(xué)帝國理工學(xué)院
9 University of Chicago 芝加哥大學(xué)
10 Eth Zurich (Swiss Federal Institution of Technology) 瑞士蘇黎世聯(lián)邦理工學(xué)院
