英美發(fā)起反吸管運(yùn)動(dòng) 對(duì)塑料吸管說(shuō)不

Every day, Americans throw away 500 million plastic straws, enough to circle the Earth twice, or fill 125 school buses.

每天美國(guó)人都要扔掉5億根塑料吸管，足以繞地球兩圈，或者裝滿125輛校車。

Made from fossil fuels, they are almost never recycled because they're too small and could be made from several different types of plastic. They simply contribute to the massive problem of plastic pollution; eight million tons of plastic is dumped into the oceans every year.

用化石燃料制成的塑料吸管幾乎從來(lái)不會(huì)被回收利用，因?yàn)樗鼈凅w積太小，而且可能是由好幾種不同類型的塑料制成的。這些吸管直接加劇了塑料污染的嚴(yán)重問(wèn)題，每年都會(huì)有800萬(wàn)噸塑料被傾倒進(jìn)海洋中。

Plastic straws are now the target of a growing movement to reduce their use. Possibly the first of such campaigns, Be Straw Free was started in 2011 by Milo Cress, who was only nine years old at the time. "I noticed that whenever I ordered a drink at a restaurant, it would usually come with a straw in it, and I don't usually need a straw," he said.

現(xiàn)在以減少塑料吸管使用量為目標(biāo)的運(yùn)動(dòng)越來(lái)越多。“不用吸管”可能是第一場(chǎng)這樣的運(yùn)動(dòng)，該運(yùn)動(dòng)在2011年由年僅9歲的米羅•克雷斯發(fā)起?？死姿拐f(shuō)：“我注意到，無(wú)論何時(shí)我在餐廳點(diǎn)飲料，杯子里總會(huì)有吸管，而我一般不需要吸管。”

"This seemed like a huge waste. Straws are made of oil, a precious and finite resource. Is making single-use plastic straws, which will be used for a matter of minutes before being tossed away, really what we want to do with this resource?"

“這看起來(lái)是一個(gè)巨大的浪費(fèi)。塑料吸管是用石油制成的，而石油是一種寶貴的有限資源。用石油生產(chǎn)才用幾分鐘就丟掉的一次性吸管，我們真的想這么利用資源嗎?”

Cress started asking restaurants in Burlington, Vermont, where he lived at the time, to stop providing straws automatically to customers and make them optional instead. Many agreed and his request made ripples nationwide. He says that restaurants that make the switch report a reduction in the number of straws they use between 50 and 80%.

克雷斯開始請(qǐng)求他當(dāng)時(shí)的居住地佛蒙特州伯靈頓的餐廳停止自動(dòng)為顧客提供吸管，改為自選。許多餐廳都同意了，他的請(qǐng)求產(chǎn)生的影響像漣漪一般在全國(guó)擴(kuò)散開來(lái)。他說(shuō)，做出改變的餐廳報(bào)告說(shuō)，所用的吸管數(shù)量減少了50%到80%。

The anti-straw sentiment has crossed borders into the UK, where straws have been included in a government plan to ban all plastic waste by 2042. Last year, large pub chain Wetherspoons announced that it would replace plastic straws with paper alternatives across 900 outlets. After the announcement, many smaller chains and pubs across the country followed suit. According to Wetherspoons CEO John Hutson, the move will save 70 million plastic straws a year and the reaction from patrons has been "very positive."

反吸管熱潮還擴(kuò)散到了英國(guó)，吸管被納入了英國(guó)政府在2042年前禁止所有塑料垃圾的計(jì)劃。去年，大型連鎖酒吧Wetherspoons宣布，將在900家分店中把塑料吸管替換為紙吸管。在這之后，英國(guó)許多中小型連鎖店和酒吧紛紛效仿。Wetherspoons公司的首席執(zhí)行官約翰•哈特森表示，此舉每年將節(jié)省7000萬(wàn)根塑料吸管，從客戶那里得到的反饋也“非常積極”。

Offering alternatives or making plastic straws optional, rather than banning them outright, is a common trait among these campaigns. "We do not want to make people feel bad for needing or even wanting to use a straw in their drink," said Jackie Nunez, founder of The Last Plastic Straw.

提供塑料吸管的替代品，或者將塑料吸管變?yōu)榭蛇x項(xiàng)，而不是完全禁止，是這類活動(dòng)的普遍特征。“最后一根塑料吸管”運(yùn)動(dòng)的創(chuàng)始人杰基•努涅斯說(shuō)：“我們不想讓人們因?yàn)樾枰蛳胍梦芎蕊嬃隙械讲煌纯臁?rdquo;

"There are many other viable alternatives to single-use plastic drinking straws that are less harmful to the environment, wildlife and humans," she said.

她說(shuō)：“有其他許多對(duì)環(huán)境、野生動(dòng)物和人類更無(wú)害的可行選擇可以替代一次性塑料吸管。”

Some people use straws to reduce the damage of sugary or acidic drinks to their teeth, or due to special requirements. "There are disabled people who write me to tell me they carry reusable straws with them -- many reusable straws even come with a carrying case," said Cress. "There are reusable glass, stainless steel, copper, bamboo, and several other kinds of reusable straws."

有些人為了降低含糖或酸性飲料對(duì)牙齒的傷害或其他特殊需求而使用吸管。“有些不得不用吸管的人寫信告訴我，他們隨身攜帶可反復(fù)使用的吸管——許多這種吸管還自帶收納盒，”克雷斯說(shuō)，“現(xiàn)在有可反復(fù)使用的玻璃吸管、不銹鋼吸管、銅吸管、竹吸管，還有好幾種其他類型的吸管可多次使用。”

By not demonizing the straw as an object, he thinks activists can hope to achieve better goals. "I am not out to ban straws. I think it's much more effective to encourage people to make the choice not to use them. Voluntary participation encourages people to spread the word. Forcing people to do things is not always the most effective way to make a change."

他認(rèn)為，如果不將吸管這個(gè)物品妖魔化，反吸管活動(dòng)有望達(dá)到更高的目標(biāo)。“我不贊成禁止吸管。我認(rèn)為鼓勵(lì)人們選擇不用吸管會(huì)有效得多。自愿的參與會(huì)鼓勵(lì)人們傳播信息。強(qiáng)迫人們?nèi)プ鍪虏灰欢ㄊ沁_(dá)成改變最有效的方式。”