雅思寫作高分范文社會(huì)犯罪話題之社會(huì)法律規(guī)范
Society if based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
雅思大作文解題思路：
應(yīng)該遵守：法律和法規(guī)是社會(huì)有序運(yùn)行的前提，它們規(guī)范了人們的行為和思想，讓人們的活動(dòng)能限制在一個(gè)安全的，合法的范圍。相反，一旦人們恣意妄為地來(lái)忽略這些法律的話，整個(gè)社會(huì)會(huì)陷入混亂。舉例，如果交通法規(guī)不被遵守，則會(huì)出現(xiàn)大量的車禍。如果刑法不被遵守的話，則會(huì)出現(xiàn)大量的社會(huì)犯罪。
不應(yīng)該遵守：對(duì)于那些不公正的法律，人們應(yīng)該被授予足夠的自由來(lái)進(jìn)行對(duì)抗。舉例，如果美國(guó)今天仍然保留著奴隸法案的話，則今天的美國(guó)黑人將處境悲慘，沒(méi)有教育，醫(yī)療，工作和投票的權(quán)利?？梢钥吹?，這樣的法律必將引發(fā)來(lái)自黑人的憤怒，反抗，甚至是戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。
雅思大作文高分范文：
Nowadays,there is an assertion that the freedom of citizens should be limited; otherwiseit might harm the social laws and justice system, thus making our societyunstable. Personally, this view is psychologically right, while it overlooksthe importance of fighting against the unfair laws freely.
Firstly,there is no doubt that obeying social rules and laws is the fundamentalobligation for all individuals, for the reason that they serve as a keyfunction of ensuring our society running on the right track. Obviously, theseregulations define the borders between the right and the wrong, the socialethics and day-to-day conduct standards, all of which can instruct and regulatecitizens to act and think in a lawful, polite and safe way. Otherwise, theignorance of these regulations, or so-called “an absolute freedom”, will trapour society into chaos and even malfunction. For example, if the traffic lawswere disrespected, it is expected that all streets and highways will be full ofcongestions and car crashes caused by wrongdoings in driving like blind overspeed or overtaking. Similarly, if the criminal law were absent, then therewill be no concern of punishments for committing crimes. Consequently, illegalactivities including thefts, robberies, arson, rapes, vandalism and murderswill be overwhelming, which will not only place the poverties and lives of thepublic in the danger, but also destroy today’s civilization in a long term.
However, there is always a justification that people should be allowed tofreely question and topple those unfair laws that are the barriers of democracydevelopment. In history, the typical example is the slavery law in America thatdefined African-Americans as second-class citizens and deprived their rights ofpublic education, health care and vote. If this evil law were just followed,instead of being eradicated through the pursuit of human freedom, we now canpredict clearly that current the community of America would be still full ofinequity, discrimination, and massive social disorder caused by conflictsbetween the black and white.
All in all, I agree that it is very necessary to limit the freedom of thepublic by confining their behaviors in the bounds of social regulation andlaws, which is the pre-condition of social democracy and stability. However,when it comes to unjust laws, the public should have the freedom to eliminatethem.(392 words)
