海底兩萬里 第5期 第1章 飛走的暗礁(5)

　　An interminable debate then broke out between believers and skeptics in the scholarly societies and scientific journals.

　　于是，在學(xué)術(shù)團(tuán)體里和科學(xué)報(bào)刊中產(chǎn)生了相信者和懷疑者，這兩派人無休止地爭(zhēng)論著。

　　The monster question inflamed all minds.

　　怪物問題激動(dòng)著人們。

　　During this memorable campaign, journalists making a profession of science battled with those making a profession of wit,

　　自以為懂科學(xué)的新聞?dòng)浾吆鸵幌蜃砸詾槎嗖诺奈娜碎_起火來，他們?cè)谶@次值得紀(jì)念的筆戰(zhàn)中花費(fèi)了不少的墨水!

　　spilling waves of ink and some of them even two or three drops of blood, since they went from sea serpents to the most offensive personal remarks.

　　甚至有幾個(gè)人還流了兩三滴血，因?yàn)橛腥税厌槍?duì)大海蛇的筆鋒移向一些態(tài)度傲慢的家伙身上了。

　　For six months the war seesawed.

　　在六個(gè)月當(dāng)中，爭(zhēng)論繼續(xù)著。

　　With inexhaustible zest, the popular press took potshots at feature articles from theGeographic Institute of Brazil,

　　彼此有理，各執(zhí)一詞。當(dāng)時(shí)流行的小報(bào)都興致勃勃地刊登爭(zhēng)論的文章，它們不是攻擊巴西地理學(xué)院、

　　the Royal Academy of Science in Berlin, the British Association, the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., at discussions in The Indian Archipelago,

　　柏林皇家科學(xué)院、不列顛學(xué)術(shù)聯(lián)合會(huì)或華盛頓斯密孫學(xué)院發(fā)表的權(quán)威論文，就是駁斥印度群島報(bào)、

　　in Cosmos published by Father Moigno, in Petermann's Mittheilungen,and at scientific chronicles in the great French and foreign newspapers.

　　摩亞諾神父的宇宙雜志、皮德曼的消息報(bào)里面的討論和法國(guó)及其他各國(guó)大報(bào)刊的科學(xué)新聞。

　　When the monster's detractors cited a saying by the botanist Linnaeus that nature doesn't make leaps, witty writers in the popular periodicals parodied it,

　　這些多才的作家故意曲解反對(duì)派也常引證的林奈的一句話：

　　maintaining in essence that nature doesn't make lunatics, and ordering their contemporaries never to give the lie to nature by believing in krakens,

　　大自然不制造蠢東西;懇求大家不要相信北海的大怪魚、

　　sea serpents, Moby Dicks, and other all-out efforts from drunken seamen.

　　大海蛇、莫比·狄克和瘋狂的海員們臆造出來的其它怪物的存在，不要因此而否定了大自然。